BHESAN POLICE STATION vs NAYANBHAI DINESHBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - S R DODIYA — 463/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 189(2),190,191(2),191(3),115(2),118(1),296(B). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN110006902025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
470/2025
Filing Date
04-12-2025
Registration No
463/2025
Registration Date
04-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHESAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHESAN POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
NAYANBHAI DINESHBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - S R DODIYA
JIGNESH DINESHBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. S R DODIYA
NAGJIBHAI BHANUBHAI VAGHELA
Adv. S R DODIYA
CHANDUBHAI CHAKABHAI VAGHELA
Adv. S R DODIYA
PARESHBHAI KARABHAI MAKAVANA
Adv. S R DODIYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 19-01-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Mehsana First Class Magistrate Court acquitted five accused persons in a criminal case involving charges of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt under IPC sections 148, 149, 341, 506, 325, and 337. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses turned hostile and failed to support the prosecution's evidence, making it unsafe to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Mehsana First Class Magistrate Court acquitted five accused persons in a criminal case involving charges of wrongful restraint, criminal intimidation, and causing grievous hurt under IPC sections 148, 149, 341, 506, 325, and 337. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, as key witnesses turned hostile and failed to support the prosecution's evidence, making it unsafe to convict the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts