BHESAN POLICE STATION vs VISHAL LALITBHAI CHUAHAN Advocate - V V RANVA — 456/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110006832025

Filing Number

463/2025

Filing Date

03-Dec-2025

Registration No

456/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203007250317

Police Station

BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),98(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHESAN POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHAL LALITBHAI CHUAHAN Advocate - V V RANVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Summary The court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Prohibition Act after finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the seized foreign liquor (Royal Stag whisky bottles) recovered from the defendant's possession was genuine, as the panchnama witnesses could not corroborate the recovery details and no independent evidence supported the prosecution's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 30-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 03-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 456/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Prohibition Act after finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the seized foreign liquor (Royal Stag whisky bottles) recovered from the defendant's possession was genuine, as the panchnama witnesses could not corroborate the recovery details and no independent evidence supported the prosecution's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case