BHESAN POLICE STATION vs VISHAL LALITBHAI CHUAHAN Advocate - V V RANVA — 456/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A),98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 08th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN110006832025
Filing Number
463/2025
Filing Date
03-Dec-2025
Registration No
456/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHESAN
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
08-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203007250317
Police Station
BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BHESAN POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHAL LALITBHAI CHUAHAN Advocate - V V RANVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary The court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Prohibition Act after finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the seized foreign liquor (Royal Stag whisky bottles) recovered from the defendant's possession was genuine, as the panchnama witnesses could not corroborate the recovery details and no independent evidence supported the prosecution's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 456/2025
Summary The court acquitted the defendant of charges under the Prohibition Act after finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish that the seized foreign liquor (Royal Stag whisky bottles) recovered from the defendant's possession was genuine, as the panchnama witnesses could not corroborate the recovery details and no independent evidence supported the prosecution's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts