BHESAN POLICE STATION vs VIJAYBHAI BABUBHAI DHAKHADA Advocate - D N PARMAR — 418/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 85,115(1),351(3),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN110006242025
Filing Number
425/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
418/2025
Registration Date
16-10-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHESAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203007240471
Police Station
BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHESAN POLICE STATION
Adv. M B CHAUHAN
Respondent(s)
VIJAYBHAI BABUBHAI DHAKHADA Advocate - D N PARMAR
BALUBHAI BHANABHAI DHAKHADA
Adv. D N PARMAR
KAILASHBEN W.O.BALUBHAI DHAKHADA
Adv. D N PARMAR
SAGARBHAI BALUBHAI DHAKHADA
Adv. D N PARMAR
SUMITABEN D/O BALUBHAI BHANABHAI DHAKHADA
Adv. D N PARMAR
CHANDRIKABEN W.O. ASHOKBHAI HARIBHAI DHAKHADA
Adv. D N PARMAR
DEVRAJBHAI JETHABHAI MAHIDA
Adv. D N PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 11-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted all seven accused in a dowry-related cruelty case under IPC Sections 498A, 406, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to support the prosecution's charges. The court held that since material witnesses failed to corroborate the prosecution narrative and no reliable independent evidence existed, continuing the trial would be futile, warranting acquittal under established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted all seven accused in a dowry-related cruelty case under IPC Sections 498A, 406, and 34, finding insufficient evidence to support the prosecution's charges. The court held that since material witnesses failed to corroborate the prosecution narrative and no reliable independent evidence existed, continuing the trial would be futile, warranting acquittal under established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts