BHESAN POLICE STATION vs HARESHBHAI LAKHUBHAI DEGADA Advocate - S R DODIYA — 325/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 14th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110005132025

Case disposed

Filing Number

332/2025

Filing Date

15-09-2025

Registration No

325/2025

Registration Date

15-09-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A)

Petitioner(s)

BHESAN POLICE STATION

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

HARESHBHAI LAKHUBHAI DEGADA Advocate - S R DODIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-05-2026

Disposed

12-05-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

01-05-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

29-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

24-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

14-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Hareshbhai Lakhubhai Degda, under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that none of the five panchas (witnesses) who prepared the recovery panchnama supported the prosecution's case, and the recovery of the alleged illegal liquor lacked independent corroboration, rendering the evidence inadmissible and untrustworthy to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Hareshbhai Lakhubhai Degda, under Section 65(A)(A) of the Prohibition Act, finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court held that none of the five panchas (witnesses) who prepared the recovery panchnama supported the prosecution's case, and the recovery of the alleged illegal liquor lacked independent corroboration, rendering the evidence inadmissible and untrustworthy to prove guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case