Government of Gujarat vs Vikrambhai Bachubhai Vaghela — 263/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110003672024

Case disposed

Filing Number

263/2024

Filing Date

24-07-2024

Registration No

263/2024

Registration Date

24-07-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

11th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203007240009

Police Station

BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vikrambhai Bachubhai Vaghela

Bharat @ Shankar Gabharubhai Valdoriya

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

11-05-2026

Disposed

29-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

22-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

15-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

03-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

11-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted two accused (Vikrambhai Babubhai Waghela and Bharat Uday Shankar Gabhrubhai Walodariya) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 379, 457, and 114 (theft, house-breaking by night, and abetment) for stealing copper wire worth ₹15,450. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the investigating officer did not properly examine five witnesses who could have corroborated the charges, and the evidence presented lacked quality and substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted two accused (Vikrambhai Babubhai Waghela and Bharat Uday Shankar Gabhrubhai Walodariya) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 379, 457, and 114 (theft, house-breaking by night, and abetment) for stealing copper wire worth ₹15,450. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the investigating officer did not properly examine five witnesses who could have corroborated the charges, and the evidence presented lacked quality and substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case