Government of Gujarat vs Vikrambhai Bachubhai Vaghela — 263/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 11th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN110003672024
Filing Number
263/2024
Filing Date
24-07-2024
Registration No
263/2024
Registration Date
24-07-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, BHESAN
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
11th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203007240009
Police Station
BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vikrambhai Bachubhai Vaghela
Bharat @ Shankar Gabharubhai Valdoriya
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 22-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 15-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 03-04-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted two accused (Vikrambhai Babubhai Waghela and Bharat Uday Shankar Gabhrubhai Walodariya) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 379, 457, and 114 (theft, house-breaking by night, and abetment) for stealing copper wire worth ₹15,450. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the investigating officer did not properly examine five witnesses who could have corroborated the charges, and the evidence presented lacked quality and substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted two accused (Vikrambhai Babubhai Waghela and Bharat Uday Shankar Gabhrubhai Walodariya) of charges under Indian Penal Code sections 379, 457, and 114 (theft, house-breaking by night, and abetment) for stealing copper wire worth ₹15,450. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt beyond reasonable doubt as the investigating officer did not properly examine five witnesses who could have corroborated the charges, and the evidence presented lacked quality and substance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts