BHESAN POLICE STATION vs MUKESHBHAI NAJABHAI PARMAR Advocate - S R DODIYA — 51/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),118(2),296(B),351(2),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110000822026

Filing Number

51/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

51/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203007250326

Police Station

BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),118(2),296(B),351(2),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHESAN POLICE STATION

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI NAJABHAI PARMAR Advocate - S R DODIYA

  2. 2.HARESHBHAI MUKESHBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. S R DODIYA

  3. 3.BHANUBEN W.O.MUKESHBHAI PARMAR

    Adv. S R DODIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court acquitted all three accused of the criminal charges under IPC Sections 115, 118, 296, 351, 54, and IPC Section 135 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the complainant's testimony alone could not establish the alleged criminal conspiracy and assault beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused's denial of charges remained uncontradicted by credible corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 22-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 25-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 07-Feb-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 51/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court acquitted all three accused of the criminal charges under IPC Sections 115, 118, 296, 351, 54, and IPC Section 135 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the complainant's testimony alone could not establish the alleged criminal conspiracy and assault beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused's denial of charges remained uncontradicted by credible corroborating evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case