Government of Gujarat vs Himmatbhai Jivanbhai Parmar Advocate - V V RANVA — 25/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(kha),506(2),114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110000372024

Case disposed

Filing Number

25/2024

Filing Date

17-01-2024

Registration No

25/2024

Registration Date

17-01-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

28th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203007230491

Police Station

BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,294(kha),506(2),114
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Himmatbhai Jivanbhai Parmar Advocate - V V RANVA

Jayeshbhai Himmatbhai Parmar

Adv. V V RANVA

Bharatbhai Hirabhai Vaghela

Adv. V V RANVA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

28-04-2026

Disposed

22-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

17-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

01-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

18-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

28-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Judgment Summary The Mehsana Magistrate's Court acquitted three defendants of murder charges (IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114, and IPC Section 135) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the crime's essential elements beyond reasonable doubt, as the testimony of examined witnesses lacked credibility and corroborating evidence was inadequate to prove the charges against the accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The Mehsana Magistrate's Court acquitted three defendants of murder charges (IPC Sections 323, 294(b), 506(2), 114, and IPC Section 135) due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the crime's essential elements beyond reasonable doubt, as the testimony of examined witnesses lacked credibility and corroborating evidence was inadequate to prove the charges against the accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case