BHESAN POLICE STATION vs GULMAHAMADBHAI MUSABHAI KOREJA Advocate - S R DODIYA — 10/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 296(B),351(2),351(3),352,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN110000282026

Case disposed

Filing Number

10/2026

Filing Date

07-01-2026

Registration No

10/2026

Registration Date

07-01-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203007250456

Police Station

BHESAN POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 296(B),351(2),351(3),352,54

Petitioner(s)

BHESAN POLICE STATION

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

GULMAHAMADBHAI MUSABHAI KOREJA Advocate - S R DODIYA

SAMIRBHAI GULMAHAMADBHAI KOREJA

Adv. S R DODIYA

HANIFBHAI GULMAHAMADBHAI KOREJA

Adv. S R DODIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

16-04-2026

Disposed

04-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

18-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

11-03-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

16-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted three accused persons in a criminal case involving assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with reliable evidence, as key witnesses did not support the charges and the evidence was insufficient to prove the alleged crime beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that when material witnesses turn hostile and prosecution evidence lacks credibility, the accused deserves acquittal rather than prolonging unnecessary trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Gujarat High Court acquitted three accused persons in a criminal case involving assault and criminal intimidation. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case with reliable evidence, as key witnesses did not support the charges and the evidence was insufficient to prove the alleged crime beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that when material witnesses turn hostile and prosecution evidence lacks credibility, the accused deserves acquittal rather than prolonging unnecessary trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, BHESAN All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case