Government of Gujarat vs DHANRAJGIRI S/O SURESHGIRI HARIGIRI MEGHNATHI Advocate - V U VADAR — 690/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 351(3),296(B),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 15th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN100009162025
Filing Number
690/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
690/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0563
Police Station
VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DHANRAJGIRI S/O SURESHGIRI HARIGIRI MEGHNATHI Advocate - V U VADAR
-
2.BHAVESHGIRI VINODGIRI MEGHNATHI
Adv. V U VADAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Judegement
Summary The Vanthli Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court acquitted two defendants, Dhanrajgiri and Bhaveshgiri, of charges under IPC Sections 341(3), 294(b), and 54, finding insufficient evidence that they abused or threatened the complainant and her husband. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's own testimony contradicted the charges and no corroborating evidence established criminal conduct. The accused were ordered acquitted with a bail amount of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Judgement
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
03-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 690/2025
Summary The Vanthli Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate's Court acquitted two defendants, Dhanrajgiri and Bhaveshgiri, of charges under IPC Sections 341(3), 294(b), and 54, finding insufficient evidence that they abused or threatened the complainant and her husband. The court determined that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's own testimony contradicted the charges and no corroborating evidence established criminal conduct. The accused were ordered acquitted with a bail amount of ₹10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts