Government of Gujarat vs KARA MUSABHAI SAANDH — 661/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN100008842025
Filing Number
661/2025
Filing Date
08-Oct-2025
Registration No
661/2025
Registration Date
08-Oct-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 15-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KARA MUSABHAI SAANDH
-
2.AASIF MUSABHAI SODHA
-
3.MUSTAQ IQBALBHAI DHANANI
-
4.NAYAN SAVJIBHAI PAARDHI
-
5.AEJAZ YUSUFBHAI ABDA
-
6.SUDHIR DUDABHAI CHUDASAMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court found the accused guilty under the Consumer Protection Act for selling adulterated food items and imposed a fine of Rs. 300 on the accused while also directing payment of compensation to the victim. The court held that the accused failed to maintain proper food safety standards and violated consumer rights, warranting criminal punishment and remedial measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Mar-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 661/2025
The court found the accused guilty under the Consumer Protection Act for selling adulterated food items and imposed a fine of Rs. 300 on the accused while also directing payment of compensation to the victim. The court held that the accused failed to maintain proper food safety standards and violated consumer rights, warranting criminal punishment and remedial measures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts