M/S. PUNIT TRADERS SOLE PROPITOR KIRITBHAI PRABHUDASBHAI BATVIYA vs P.G.V.C.L. - BANTWA Advocate - K.T.DUBEY — 21/2019
Case under Electricity Act, 2003 Section 135. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th April 2026.
SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN100005652019
Filing Number
21/2019
Filing Date
30-Jun-2014
Registration No
21/2019
Registration Date
30-Jun-2014
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. PUNIT TRADERS SOLE PROPITOR KIRITBHAI PRABHUDASBHAI BATVIYA
Adv. K.C.SHINGALA
Respondent(s)
-
1.P.G.V.C.L. - BANTWA Advocate - K.T.DUBEY
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: M/S. Punit Traders v. P.G.V.C.L. Court Decision: The plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 5,50,000 (comprising a supplementary electricity theft bill of Rs. 3,81,937 plus interest and damages) was dismissed. The court upheld PGVCL's electricity theft allegations and the supplementary bill as legally valid. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant electricity company properly identified meter tampering through anomalous "XDT" readings in the meter's MRI data, consistent with Larsen & Toubro's technical guidelines. Although the plaintiff argued procedural violations and lack of natural justice, the court rejected these claims, citing Gujarat High Court precedent that natural justice principles don't apply to electricity theft assessments. The plaintiff's failure to challenge the bill before the Special Court under Section 154 of the Electricity Act before paying, combined with the court's acceptance of the technical evidence, resulted in dismissal with costs borne by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Jan-2026
Final Arguments
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
Restored
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Oct-2025
OrderView PDF
-
27-Oct-2025
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Oct-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Sep-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Aug-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Jul-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jun-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-May-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Apr-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Mar-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Feb-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Jan-2025
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Dec-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Nov-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Oct-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Sep-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Sep-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Aug-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Jul-2024
Defendant Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
20-Jun-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Apr-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Mar-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Dec-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Aug-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Jul-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jun-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-May-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Apr-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Feb-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Jan-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Dec-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Nov-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Oct-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Sep-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Aug-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Jul-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Jun-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jun-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Apr-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Mar-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Feb-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Feb-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2022
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Dec-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Dec-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Nov-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Oct-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Sep-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Sep-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Aug-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
15-Jul-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Apr-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Feb-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Feb-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jan-2021
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Aug-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jul-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jul-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Jun-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-May-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-May-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
23-Apr-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Apr-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Mar-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Feb-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Jan-2020
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Dec-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
21-Nov-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Oct-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
19-Sep-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Aug-2019
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Aug-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jun-2014
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2019
Case Summary: M/S. Punit Traders v. P.G.V.C.L. Court Decision: The plaintiff's suit for recovery of Rs. 5,50,000 (comprising a supplementary electricity theft bill of Rs. 3,81,937 plus interest and damages) was dismissed. The court upheld PGVCL's electricity theft allegations and the supplementary bill as legally valid. Key Reasoning: The court found the defendant electricity company properly identified meter tampering through anomalous "XDT" readings in the meter's MRI data, consistent with Larsen & Toubro's technical guidelines. Although the plaintiff argued procedural violations and lack of natural justice, the court rejected these claims, citing Gujarat High Court precedent that natural justice principles don't apply to electricity theft assessments. The plaintiff's failure to challenge the bill before the Special Court under Section 154 of the Electricity Act before paying, combined with the court's acceptance of the technical evidence, resulted in dismissal with costs borne by the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts