KIRAN RAMAJIBHAI CHAPALA vs SARPANCH SHREE, SARDARGADH — 37/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 01-Jul-2026 this date has passed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN100005092024

Filing Number

37/2024

Filing Date

16-Jul-2024

Registration No

37/2024

Registration Date

16-Jul-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN RAMAJIBHAI CHAPALA

    Adv. M M SAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SARPANCH SHREE, SARDARGADH

  2. 2.STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 04-Feb-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 31-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 12-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 11-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 20-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 30-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary Case No.: R.C.S 37/24 | Court: Principal Sr. Civil Judge, Vanthali, Junagadh | Date: 30 July 2025 The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to restrain removal of his pan/bidi shop encroachment on government pasturage land (Survey No. 286) was rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he admitted to unauthorized encroachment on government land but produced no documents proving any legal right to occupy it. Consequently, the court declined to consider balance of convenience or irreparable loss arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 30-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 11-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 04-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 18-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 22-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 02-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 04-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 07-Mar-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 14-Feb-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 17-Jan-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 14-Dec-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 22-Nov-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 25-Oct-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 27-Sep-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 09-Aug-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 23-Jul-2024

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 16-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 16-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 37/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No.: R.C.S 37/24 | Court: Principal Sr. Civil Judge, Vanthali, Junagadh | Date: 30 July 2025 The plaintiff's application for temporary injunction to restrain removal of his pan/bidi shop encroachment on government pasturage land (Survey No. 286) was rejected. The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he admitted to unauthorized encroachment on government land but produced no documents proving any legal right to occupy it. Consequently, the court declined to consider balance of convenience or irreparable loss arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case