MILIBEN D/O MAULESHBHAI GOPALDAS KANSAGARA vs GOPALDAS PUNJABHAI KANASAGARA Advocate - R C NADPARA — 4/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN100002272025

Filing Number

4/2025

Filing Date

19-Mar-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

19-Mar-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MILIBEN D/O MAULESHBHAI GOPALDAS KANSAGARA

    Adv. V U VADAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPALDAS PUNJABHAI KANASAGARA Advocate - R C NADPARA

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Order

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Order

    Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant (her grandfather) from transferring ancestral joint family property. While the court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case as a coparcener, it held that she failed to demonstrate irreparable loss or that balance of convenience favored granting the injunction, noting the defendant showed no actual intent to sell and citing Supreme Court precedent prohibiting blanket injunctions on joint Hindu family property absent waste or ouster. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 31-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 09-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 18-Sep-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 03-Sep-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 21-Aug-2025

    For Counter Affidavit

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 30-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 09-Jul-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 25-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 11-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 16-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 15-May-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 19-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 19-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 19-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendant (her grandfather) from transferring ancestral joint family property. While the court found the plaintiff had a prima facie case as a coparcener, it held that she failed to demonstrate irreparable loss or that balance of convenience favored granting the injunction, noting the defendant showed no actual intent to sell and citing Supreme Court precedent prohibiting blanket injunctions on joint Hindu family property absent waste or ouster. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case