Government of Gujarat vs SOHIL IBRAHIMBHAI URFE BASIRBHAI SAMA Advocate - I A SAMA — 169/2026

Case Summary: CCN_169_2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Sohil Ibrahimbhai, Mohabbat Ibrahimbhai, Roshanben, and Dilshana) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 341(3), 94, and GPA Section 137. The complainant failed to prove the allegations of assault with a wooden stick, abusive language, and threats beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence lacked direct corroboration of the complainant's testimony. Key Reasoning: The judge found that while the complainant testified to being beaten and threatened by the accused, the cross-examination revealed contradictions—the complainant admitted police filed the FIR at the hospital without independent verification. Crucially, the prosecution presented no additional witnesses to corroborate the alleged assault, and supporting documents (medical certificates, weapon seizure records) alone cannot establish guilt without direct evidence of the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.