Government of Gujarat vs SOHIL IBRAHIMBHAI URFE BASIRBHAI SAMA Advocate - I A SAMA — 169/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN100002162026

Filing Number

169/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

169/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0717

Police Station

VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54
Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOHIL IBRAHIMBHAI URFE BASIRBHAI SAMA Advocate - I A SAMA

  2. 2.MOHABBAT IBRAHIMBHAI URFE BASIRBHAI SAMA

    Adv. I A SAMA

  3. 3.ROSHANBEN W/O IBRAHIMBHAI URFE BASIRBHAI HUSAINBHAI SAMA

    Adv. I A SAMA

  4. 4.DILSHANABEN URFE TAMU D/O IBRAHIMBHAI URFE BASIRBHAI HUSAINBHAI SAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CCN_169_2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Sohil Ibrahimbhai, Mohabbat Ibrahimbhai, Roshanben, and Dilshana) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 341(3), 94, and GPA Section 137. The complainant failed to prove the allegations of assault with a wooden stick, abusive language, and threats beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence lacked direct corroboration of the complainant's testimony. Key Reasoning: The judge found that while the complainant testified to being beaten and threatened by the accused, the cross-examination revealed contradictions—the complainant admitted police filed the FIR at the hospital without independent verification. Crucially, the prosecution presented no additional witnesses to corroborate the alleged assault, and supporting documents (medical certificates, weapon seizure records) alone cannot establish guilt without direct evidence of the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Apr-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 169/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CCN_169_2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Sohil Ibrahimbhai, Mohabbat Ibrahimbhai, Roshanben, and Dilshana) of charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 296(b), 341(3), 94, and GPA Section 137. The complainant failed to prove the allegations of assault with a wooden stick, abusive language, and threats beyond reasonable doubt, as the evidence lacked direct corroboration of the complainant's testimony. Key Reasoning: The judge found that while the complainant testified to being beaten and threatened by the accused, the cross-examination revealed contradictions—the complainant admitted police filed the FIR at the hospital without independent verification. Crucially, the prosecution presented no additional witnesses to corroborate the alleged assault, and supporting documents (medical certificates, weapon seizure records) alone cannot establish guilt without direct evidence of the accused's culpability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case