Government of Gujarat vs VIJAYBHAI HIMMATBHAI VIRBHADIYA — 163/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN100002102026

Filing Number

163/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0069

Police Station

VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYBHAI HIMMATBHAI VIRBHADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court upheld the conviction of respondent Vijaybhai Himmatbhai Virbhadiya under Probation of Offenders Act Section 56(1), imposing a fine of Rs. 200/- with three months' imprisonment in default. The court found the respondent's appeals under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act lacking merit and dismissed the contentions that proper procedure was followed or that there were grounds for leniency based on age or social status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court upheld the conviction of respondent Vijaybhai Himmatbhai Virbhadiya under Probation of Offenders Act Section 56(1), imposing a fine of Rs. 200/- with three months' imprisonment in default. The court found the respondent's appeals under Sections 3 and 4 of the Act lacking merit and dismissed the contentions that proper procedure was followed or that there were grounds for leniency based on age or social status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case