Government of Gujarat vs RAFIKBHAI YUSUFBHAI JETHWA Advocate - J H VANVI — 161/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN100002072026

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0091

Police Station

VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAFIKBHAI YUSUFBHAI JETHWA Advocate - J H VANVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CCN_161_2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Rafikbhai Yusufbhai Jethwa of all charges under IPC sections 114(2), 296(b), and 351(3). The court found insufficient evidence that the accused caused physical injury, abused the complainant with foul language, or made threats to life. The court noted the complainant's testimony lacked concrete details about alleged abusive words and that injuries appeared to result from an altercation rather than deliberate assault by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CCN_161_2026 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Rafikbhai Yusufbhai Jethwa of all charges under IPC sections 114(2), 296(b), and 351(3). The court found insufficient evidence that the accused caused physical injury, abused the complainant with foul language, or made threats to life. The court noted the complainant's testimony lacked concrete details about alleged abusive words and that injuries appeared to result from an altercation rather than deliberate assault by the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case