Government of Gujarat vs SATISHBHAI DAAMJIBHAI NAKUM Advocate - N S MAKWANA — 160/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN100002062026

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

01-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0090

Police Station

VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 115(2),296(B),351(3),54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SATISHBHAI DAAMJIBHAI NAKUM Advocate - N S MAKWANA

  2. 2.DIPESHBHAI URFE DIPO SATISHBHAI NAKUM

    Adv. N S MAKWANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-May-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted both accused Satishbhai Damjibhai Nakum and Dipeshbhai Urfe Dipo Satishbhai Nakum of charges under IPC sections 114(2), 296(b), 351(3), and 54 for allegedly assaulting the complainant at a vegetable market. The court found insufficient direct evidence that the accused hurled abusive language, physically assaulted, or threatened to kill the complainant, as the complainant's own testimony lacked specifics about the alleged abuse and the incident appeared to be a common market dispute resulting from accidental pushing rather than intentional criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted both accused Satishbhai Damjibhai Nakum and Dipeshbhai Urfe Dipo Satishbhai Nakum of charges under IPC sections 114(2), 296(b), 351(3), and 54 for allegedly assaulting the complainant at a vegetable market. The court found insufficient direct evidence that the accused hurled abusive language, physically assaulted, or threatened to kill the complainant, as the complainant's own testimony lacked specifics about the alleged abuse and the incident appeared to be a common market dispute resulting from accidental pushing rather than intentional criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case