BHARATBHAI DESABHAI JALU vs ASHOKBHAI DESABHAI JALU Advocate - M P KHANWANI — 2/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Plaintiff Evidence Next hearing 08-Jul-2026 this date has passed

SPCS - SPECIAL CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN100002062025

Filing Number

2/2025

Filing Date

03-Mar-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

03-Mar-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI DESABHAI JALU

    Adv. N G TRAMBADIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASHOKBHAI DESABHAI JALU Advocate - M P KHANWANI

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The interim injunction application is rejected. While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding his rights to ancestral property inherited from their mother, it held that the balance of convenience did not favor granting an interim injunction and no irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied, since any monetary loss could be compensated. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Order On Injuction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 31-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 10-Dec-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Hearing On Injunction Application

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 28-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 11-Jul-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 30-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 03-May-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 08-Apr-2025

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 03-Apr-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 03-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 03-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The interim injunction application is rejected. While the court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case regarding his rights to ancestral property inherited from their mother, it held that the balance of convenience did not favor granting an interim injunction and no irreparable loss would result if the injunction were denied, since any monetary loss could be compensated. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case