Government of Gujarat vs SHERBANU MAAMADBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - N D VADAR — 158/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN100002042026
Filing Number
158/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
158/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
25th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
0071
Police Station
VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SHERBANU MAAMADBHAI MAKWANA Advocate - N D VADAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Case 158/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vanthli acquitted the defendant Sherbanu Maamadbhai Makwana of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 60-A, finding that the prosecution failed to prove "conscious possession" of the seized illicit liquor beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical deficiencies in the investigation procedure, inadequate corroboration from independent panch witnesses, and non-compliance with the Gujarat Prohibition Rules, 2012, rendering the case unproven. Key Reasoning: The court relied on the State v. Yadvendrasing precedent, noting that the investigating agency failed to establish direct possession and that panchas (independent witnesses) did not support the prosecution. Additionally, the entire investigation procedure appeared compromised, and mandatory sealing and sampling procedures were not followed, undermining the evidence's reliability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Case 158/2026 Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vanthli acquitted the defendant Sherbanu Maamadbhai Makwana of charges under the Prohibition Act, Section 60-A, finding that the prosecution failed to prove "conscious possession" of the seized illicit liquor beyond reasonable doubt. The court found critical deficiencies in the investigation procedure, inadequate corroboration from independent panch witnesses, and non-compliance with the Gujarat Prohibition Rules, 2012, rendering the case unproven. Key Reasoning: The court relied on the State v. Yadvendrasing precedent, noting that the investigating agency failed to establish direct possession and that panchas (independent witnesses) did not support the prosecution. Additionally, the entire investigation procedure appeared compromised, and mandatory sealing and sampling procedures were not followed, undermining the evidence's reliability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts