Government of Gujarat vs VASIM HUSAINBHAI KHARAIYA Advocate - B C BALVA — 153/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(A)(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN100001992026
Filing Number
153/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
153/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
25th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
0018
Police Station
VANTHALI POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VASIM HUSAINBHAI KHARAIYA Advocate - B C BALVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 153/2026 The court acquitted defendant Vasim Husainbhai Kharaiya of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor was in his conscious possession. The court noted that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, proper seizure procedures under Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012 were not followed, and the investigation procedure was procedurally deficient. The defendant was discharged and ordered released on existing bail of Rs. 10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 153/2026 The court acquitted defendant Vasim Husainbhai Kharaiya of charges under the Prohibition Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the seized liquor was in his conscious possession. The court noted that independent panch witnesses did not corroborate the prosecution's case, proper seizure procedures under Gujarat Prohibition Rules 2012 were not followed, and the investigation procedure was procedurally deficient. The defendant was discharged and ordered released on existing bail of Rs. 10,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts