DEVRAJBHAI NANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA vs MAMALATDAR SHREE, VANTHALI Advocate - A G P — 7/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJJN100000922025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

7/2025

Filing Date

18-01-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

18-01-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI

Judge

2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36

Petitioner(s)

DEVRAJBHAI NANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA

Adv. N G TRAMBADIA

Respondent(s)

MAMALATDAR SHREE, VANTHALI Advocate - A G P

CIRCLE OFFICER SHREE, VANTHALI

Adv. A G P

CITY TALATI SHREE, VANTHALI

Hearing History

Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

15-04-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

11-03-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

28-01-2026

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

18-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

06-12-2025

PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

06-12-2025
ORDER

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against an encroachment removal order. The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not provide proper documentation proving his legal right to the disputed land (Revenue Survey No. 215/316) or demonstrate ownership. The court found inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims and noted that merely paying property tax does not create legal rights over land. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against an encroachment removal order. The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not provide proper documentation proving his legal right to the disputed land (Revenue Survey No. 215/316) or demonstrate ownership. The court found inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims and noted that merely paying property tax does not create legal rights over land. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case