DEVRAJBHAI NANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA vs MAMALATDAR SHREE, VANTHALI Advocate - A G P — 7/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,36. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN100000922025
Filing Number
7/2025
Filing Date
18-Jan-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
18-Jan-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VANTHALI
Judge
2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 21-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEVRAJBHAI NANJIBHAI CHUDASAMA
Adv. N G TRAMBADIA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MAMALATDAR SHREE, VANTHALI Advocate - A G P
-
2.CIRCLE OFFICER SHREE, VANTHALI
Adv. A G P
-
3.CITY TALATI SHREE, VANTHALI
Case History
-
10-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
11-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Dec-2025
OrderView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against an encroachment removal order. The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not provide proper documentation proving his legal right to the disputed land (Revenue Survey No. 215/316) or demonstrate ownership. The court found inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims and noted that merely paying property tax does not create legal rights over land. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Dec-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Dec-2025
Order On Injuction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Nov-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Nov-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Oct-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Oct-2025
Hearing On Injunction Application
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
06-Sep-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Aug-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Jul-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jul-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Jun-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-May-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Apr-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Mar-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
14-Feb-2025
Written Statement/Reply
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Jan-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2025
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction against an encroachment removal order. The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as he could not provide proper documentation proving his legal right to the disputed land (Revenue Survey No. 215/316) or demonstrate ownership. The court found inconsistencies in the plaintiff's claims and noted that merely paying property tax does not create legal rights over land. Each party bears its own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts