HARILAL BHIMAJIBHAI ZATAKIYA vs VALLABHBHAI RAIYABHAI KANSAGARA Advocate - G L ZALAVADIYA — 30/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9,. Status: FINAL ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 20th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN090004032018
Next Hearing
20th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
30/2018
Filing Date
20-10-2018
Registration No
30/2018
Registration Date
20-10-2018
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HARILAL BHIMAJIBHAI ZATAKIYA
Adv. A.P.GATHA
Respondent(s)
VALLABHBHAI RAIYABHAI KANSAGARA Advocate - G L ZALAVADIYA
LEGAL HEIRS OF LT BHIKHUBHAI THAKARSHIBHAI AMRUTIYA(Legal Heir)
Adv. G L ZALAVADIYA2.
JAYESHBHAI BHIKHUBHAI AMRUTIYA
Adv. G L ZALAVADIYA
LEGAL HEIRS OF LT DHARAMSHIBHAI NANJIBHAI BUMTARIYA(Legal Heir)
Adv. G L ZALAVADIYA
LEGAL HEIRS OF LT BHIMABHAI NANJIBHAI BUMTARIYA(Legal Heir) 4.
DINESHBHAI BHIMABHAI ZATAKIYA
Adv. M.R.SHINGALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 10-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 25-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: RCS-30/18 | Court: Civil Court, Manavadar | Date: 24 February 2020 The plaintiff's appeal for declaration of rights to a legitimate passage way through defendants' agricultural land and consequential relief was allowed. The court granted the plaintiff a permanent right-of-way (8 feet wide) through the specified route to access their farmland, directing that defendants must not obstruct or interfere with this passage. The court determined the plaintiff established clear historical use and necessity of the route. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: RCS-30/18 | Court: Civil Court, Manavadar | Date: 24 February 2020 The plaintiff's appeal for declaration of rights to a legitimate passage way through defendants' agricultural land and consequential relief was allowed. The court granted the plaintiff a permanent right-of-way (8 feet wide) through the specified route to access their farmland, directing that defendants must not obstruct or interfere with this passage. The court determined the plaintiff established clear historical use and necessity of the route. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts