RAJESHKUMAR MANSUKHBHAI VASVELIYA PROPWRITER OF UTTAM TRADERS vs HARDIK DINESHBHAI KOTAK Advocate - S J JOSHI — 316/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN090003602022
Filing Number
316/2022
Filing Date
06-Apr-2022
Registration No
316/2022
Registration Date
06-Apr-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESHKUMAR MANSUKHBHAI VASVELIYA PROPWRITER OF UTTAM TRADERS
Adv. G L ZALAVADIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.HARDIK DINESHBHAI KOTAK Advocate - S J JOSHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: CC-316/2022 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's (Rajeshkumar Vasveliya's) case against respondent Hardik Dineshbhai Kotak under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner failed to establish that the respondent committed fraud or breach of contract regarding a Rs. 5,00,000 check. The court found the petitioner's evidence inconsistent and ruled that the respondent had provided a valid defense demonstrating proper transaction terms. Key Reasoning: The court noted discrepancies in the petitioner's testimony about the check's purpose, amount demanded, and bank statements. The respondent's witnesses and documentary evidence were found more credible, establishing that the transaction was legitimate and the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds, not fraudulent intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Feb-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
31-Dec-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Dec-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Oct-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Sep-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Aug-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Jul-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jun-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Apr-2025
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Mar-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Feb-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jan-2025
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Dec-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Oct-2024
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Sep-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
14-Aug-2024
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jun-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-May-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
-
01-Apr-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Feb-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jan-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Nov-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Oct-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Sep-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jul-2022
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jul-2022
Plea
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jun-2022
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 316/2022
Case Summary: CC-316/2022 Court Decision: The court rejected the petitioner's (Rajeshkumar Vasveliya's) case against respondent Hardik Dineshbhai Kotak under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioner failed to establish that the respondent committed fraud or breach of contract regarding a Rs. 5,00,000 check. The court found the petitioner's evidence inconsistent and ruled that the respondent had provided a valid defense demonstrating proper transaction terms. Key Reasoning: The court noted discrepancies in the petitioner's testimony about the check's purpose, amount demanded, and bank statements. The respondent's witnesses and documentary evidence were found more credible, establishing that the transaction was legitimate and the check was dishonored due to insufficient funds, not fraudulent intent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts