RAJESHKUMAR MANSUKHBHAI VASVELIYA PROPWRITER OF UTTAM TRADERS vs HARDIKBHAI DINESHBHAI KOTAK Advocate - S J JOSHI — 315/2022
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 13th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN090003592022
Filing Number
315/2022
Filing Date
06-04-2022
Registration No
315/2022
Registration Date
06-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
13th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAJESHKUMAR MANSUKHBHAI VASVELIYA PROPWRITER OF UTTAM TRADERS
Adv. G L ZALAVADIYA
Respondent(s)
HARDIKBHAI DINESHBHAI KOTAK Advocate - S J JOSHI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 27-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 04-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC-315/2022 Case: Rajeshkumar Mansukhbhai Vasveliya (Petitioner/Prop. Writer of Uttam Traders) vs. Hardikbhai Dineshbhai Kotak (Respondent) Court Decision: The court found the respondent guilty under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 (dishonored cheque). The petitioner sold buffalo to the respondent valued at ₹5,40,000, and the respondent issued three cheques which were dishonored due to "payment stopped by drawer" and signature mismatch reasons. The court rejected the respondent's defense claiming lack of business knowledge and non-receipt of cheques, finding the petitioner established proper demand notice procedures. The respondent was sentenced to criminal prosecution under CrPC Section 255(1) with bond requirement; bail bond of ₹5,000 and personal recognizance of ₹5,000 imposed; bail bonds to remain valid for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC-315/2022 Case: Rajeshkumar Mansukhbhai Vasveliya (Petitioner/Prop. Writer of Uttam Traders) vs. Hardikbhai Dineshbhai Kotak (Respondent) Court Decision: The court found the respondent guilty under the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138 (dishonored cheque). The petitioner sold buffalo to the respondent valued at ₹5,40,000, and the respondent issued three cheques which were dishonored due to "payment stopped by drawer" and signature mismatch reasons. The court rejected the respondent's defense claiming lack of business knowledge and non-receipt of cheques, finding the petitioner established proper demand notice procedures. The respondent was sentenced to criminal prosecution under CrPC Section 255(1) with bond requirement; bail bond of ₹5,000 and personal recognizance of ₹5,000 imposed; bail bonds to remain valid for six months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts