NATHABHAI MALDEBHAI SOLANKI POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KARSHANBHAI NATHABHAI SOLANKI vs RANMALBHAI NATHUBHAI PANERA Advocate - N B RAVAL — 30/2024
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34,38,39,9. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN090003192024
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
30/2024
Filing Date
03-05-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
03-05-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NATHABHAI MALDEBHAI SOLANKI POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER KARSHANBHAI NATHABHAI SOLANKI
Adv. R C NADPARA
Respondent(s)
RANMALBHAI NATHUBHAI PANERA Advocate - N B RAVAL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 17-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 09-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 04-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS-30/2024 Court Order Outcome: The court issued a detailed judgment addressing disputes between the petitioner (Nathabhai Maldebhai Solanki through Power of Attorney holder Karshanbhai) and respondent (Ranmalbhai Nathubhai Panera). The court examined multiple issues regarding land ownership, document authenticity, and conflicting claims. The judgment ultimately allowed the petitioner's case in part, directing that the petitioner's claims regarding certain aspects be recognized while dismissing other contentions of the respondent. The court ordered the petitioner to file a final decree by June 20, 2025, and directed both parties to comply with specific instructions regarding evidence and legal documentation within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS-30/2024 Court Order Outcome: The court issued a detailed judgment addressing disputes between the petitioner (Nathabhai Maldebhai Solanki through Power of Attorney holder Karshanbhai) and respondent (Ranmalbhai Nathubhai Panera). The court examined multiple issues regarding land ownership, document authenticity, and conflicting claims. The judgment ultimately allowed the petitioner's case in part, directing that the petitioner's claims regarding certain aspects be recognized while dismissing other contentions of the respondent. The court ordered the petitioner to file a final decree by June 20, 2025, and directed both parties to comply with specific instructions regarding evidence and legal documentation within the prescribed timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts