VIVEK PRAFULBHAI NARANBHAI CHAUHAN vs Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 20/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION-JMFC

CNR: GJJN090002142026

Filing Number

20/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203037260051

Police Station

MANAVADAR POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 480

Petitioner(s)

1.VIVEK PRAFULBHAI NARANBHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. M R SHINGALA
2.RAVI KISHORBHAI CHOTALIYA
3.JIGNESHBHAI URFE JASHPALBHAI SURESHCHANDRA BHATTI

Respondent(s)

1.Government of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
12-Mar-2026

JudegementView PDF

The court rejected the accused's bail plea, finding them guilty of serious criminal charges including forgery and extortion involving a fraudulent railway employment order used to extract ₹32,00,000 from the victim. The court noted the accused have a history of committing such crimes and pose a risk to society, and therefore ordered that the accused remain in custody and the land bail be forfeited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
12-Mar-2026

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
11-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the accused's bail plea, finding them guilty of serious criminal charges including forgery and extortion involving a fraudulent railway employment order used to extract ₹32,00,000 from the victim. The court noted the accused have a history of committing such crimes and pose a risk to society, and therefore ordered that the accused remain in custody and the land bail be forfeited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.