dineshbhai devrajbhai gami vs ratanben devrajbhai gami Advocate - R C NADPARA — 51/2013
Case under Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 006. Status: ORDER. Next hearing: 20th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJJN090000702013
Next Hearing
20th March 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
51/2013
Filing Date
29-11-2013
Registration No
51/2013
Registration Date
29-11-2013
Court
TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
dineshbhai devrajbhai gami
Adv. S M SONPAL
Respondent(s)
ratanben devrajbhai gami Advocate - R C NADPARA
chhandulal devrajbhai gami
sardaaben devrajbhai gami
jasvantiben devrajbhai gami
nirmalaben devrajbhai gami
navnitbhai devrajbhai gami
Adv. R C NADPARA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
ORDER
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ORDER | |
| 19-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 07-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 23-01-2026 | ORDER | |
| 13-01-2026 | ORDER |
Interim Orders
Summary The plaintiff's suit for partition of jointly owned property and cancellation of a gift deed was dismissed with costs under CPC Order 9, Rule 8 for default. The plaintiff failed to appear in court or file any report despite multiple adjournments, and the court found no valid reason to grant further extension, thereby dismissing the case due to the plaintiff's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The plaintiff's suit for partition of jointly owned property and cancellation of a gift deed was dismissed with costs under CPC Order 9, Rule 8 for default. The plaintiff failed to appear in court or file any report despite multiple adjournments, and the court found no valid reason to grant further extension, thereby dismissing the case due to the plaintiff's negligence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts