DEVAYATBHAI JETSIBHAI MARU vs BHIMAJIBHAI MAVAJIBHAI DELVADIYA — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 51. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR

CNR: GJJN090000512026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

09-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

09-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MANAVADAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 21-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVAYATBHAI JETSIBHAI MARU

    Adv. S K PANDYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHIMAJIBHAI MAVAJIBHAI DELVADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Manavdar Civil Court (dated March 14, 2026) ordered the plaintiff to pay court fees for proceeding with the case, finding that the defendant's objection to continuing the suit was valid. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim that they should not be required to pay the requisite fees to advance the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Manavdar Civil Court (dated March 14, 2026) ordered the plaintiff to pay court fees for proceeding with the case, finding that the defendant's objection to continuing the suit was valid. The court rejected the plaintiff's claim that they should not be required to pay the requisite fees to advance the case proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case