Government of Gujarat vs TOFIKBHAI KASHAMBHAI SODHA — 1287/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080018602025

Filing Number

1287/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

1287/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250605

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TOFIKBHAI KASHAMBHAI SODHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Kesod Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Tofikbhai Kashambhai Sodha under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash or negligent act endangering life) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with simple imprisonment for two days as alternative punishment. The court considered the respondent's plea of poverty, first-time offense, and family dependence in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1287/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Kesod Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted respondent Tofikbhai Kashambhai Sodha under Indian Penal Code Section 281 (rash or negligent act endangering life) and sentenced him to a fine of ₹500, with simple imprisonment for two days as alternative punishment. The court considered the respondent's plea of poverty, first-time offense, and family dependence in imposing the lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case