Government of Gujarat vs VIKRAMBHAI NANJIBHAI BARIYA — 1281/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080018542025

Filing Number

1281/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

1281/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250521

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKRAMBHAI NANJIBHAI BARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Vikrambhai Nanjibhai Bariya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 10,045, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court also ordered forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles, considering the accused's plea of poverty, family responsibility, and reform potential while relying on established Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1281/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Vikrambhai Nanjibhai Bariya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 10,045, with an alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court also ordered forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicles, considering the accused's plea of poverty, family responsibility, and reform potential while relying on established Gujarat High Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case