Government of Gujarat vs MUKESHBHAI VIRJIBHAI CHOTHANI — 1235/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--ABATED on 19th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017952025

Filing Number

1235/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1235/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

19-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ABATED

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030240778

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHBHAI VIRJIBHAI CHOTHANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court abated the case against Mukeshbhai Virjibhai Chothani, a resident of Surat, Gujarat, after determining that the defendant's death rendered the proceedings infructuous. The court issued an order to close the case as the material facts presented by both the petitioner (Government of Gujarat) and the defendant's defense could not proceed further due to the respondent's demise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-May-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1235/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court abated the case against Mukeshbhai Virjibhai Chothani, a resident of Surat, Gujarat, after determining that the defendant's death rendered the proceedings infructuous. The court issued an order to close the case as the material facts presented by both the petitioner (Government of Gujarat) and the defendant's defense could not proceed further due to the respondent's demise. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case