Government of Gujarat vs PRADIPBHAI KANABHAI BABARIYA — 1233/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017932025

Filing Number

1233/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1233/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250416

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRADIPBHAI KANABHAI BABARIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Pradipbhai Kanabhai Babariya under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for possessing illicit alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty and requested leniency, citing his poverty and family responsibilities. The court imposed a sentence of Rs. 100 fine or two days simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances and applying established sentencing principles that permit reduced sentences based on personal and social factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1233/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Pradipbhai Kanabhai Babariya under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for possessing illicit alcohol. The accused pleaded guilty and requested leniency, citing his poverty and family responsibilities. The court imposed a sentence of Rs. 100 fine or two days simple imprisonment in default, considering the accused's socioeconomic circumstances and applying established sentencing principles that permit reduced sentences based on personal and social factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case