Government of Gujarat vs HEMRAJBHAI UGABHAI MAKADIYA — 1224/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017842025

Filing Number

1224/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1224/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250377

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HEMRAJBHAI UGABHAI MAKADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Hemrajbhai Ugabhai Makadiya under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 with six months imprisonment in default. The accused, from a poor background with family responsibilities, pleaded guilty and requested leniency, which the court granted by imposing a relatively lenient sentence, considering his circumstances and voluntary confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1224/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Hemrajbhai Ugabhai Makadiya under Section 65(A) of the Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 with six months imprisonment in default. The accused, from a poor background with family responsibilities, pleaded guilty and requested leniency, which the court granted by imposing a relatively lenient sentence, considering his circumstances and voluntary confession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case