Government of Gujarat vs RAKESHBHAI KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - D K PARMAR — 1223/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080017832025
Filing Number
1223/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2025
Registration No
1223/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030240673
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAKESHBHAI KANTIBHAI PARMAR Advocate - D K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 05-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted accused Rakeshbhai Kantibhai Parmar under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹100/- with an alternate imprisonment of 2 days if fine remains unpaid. The court ordered confiscation of valuables and vehicles, and directed release of seized property upon proper verification, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances and family responsibilities as mitigating factors for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted accused Rakeshbhai Kantibhai Parmar under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹100/- with an alternate imprisonment of 2 days if fine remains unpaid. The court ordered confiscation of valuables and vehicles, and directed release of seized property upon proper verification, considering the accused's impoverished circumstances and family responsibilities as mitigating factors for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts