Government of Gujarat vs BHARATBHAI DHANJIBHAI PARMAR — 1221/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 22nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017812025

Filing Number

1221/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1221/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

22-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250763

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI DHANJIBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Bharatbhai Dhanjibhai Parmar under Section 55(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100/- (or two days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid). The court accepted the accused's plea of guilty and, considering his impoverished circumstances and family responsibilities, granted him the benefit of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Warrant Of Arrest

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1221/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Bharatbhai Dhanjibhai Parmar under Section 55(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100/- (or two days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid). The court accepted the accused's plea of guilty and, considering his impoverished circumstances and family responsibilities, granted him the benefit of reformation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case