Government of Gujarat vs KAMLESHBHAI MENDANDBHAI VAGHELA — 1220/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017802025

Filing Number

1220/2025

Filing Date

18-Nov-2025

Registration No

1220/2025

Registration Date

18-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250446

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMLESHBHAI MENDANDBHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted Kamleshbhai Mendandbhai Vaghela under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol and sentenced him to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹500, with simple imprisonment for 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. Considering the accused's economic hardship, large family dependence, and employment difficulties, the court reduced the sentence to the minimum prescribed under law while maintaining the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1220/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Kamleshbhai Mendandbhai Vaghela under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol and sentenced him to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹500, with simple imprisonment for 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. Considering the accused's economic hardship, large family dependence, and employment difficulties, the court reduced the sentence to the minimum prescribed under law while maintaining the conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case