Government of Gujarat vs SONALBEN AKBARSHA RAFAI — 1216/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080017762025
Filing Number
1216/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2025
Registration No
1216/2025
Registration Date
18-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250687
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
SONALBEN AKBARSHA RAFAI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 05-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted respondent Sonalben Akbarsha Rafai under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing liquor illegally. The court sentenced her to simple imprisonment for 2 days and imposed a fine of Rs. 500, with the alternative of an additional 2 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. In determining the sentence, the court considered mitigating factors including the respondent's admission of guilt, her impoverished economic status as the sole breadwinner of her family, and the hardship regular court attendance would cause her livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted respondent Sonalben Akbarsha Rafai under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing liquor illegally. The court sentenced her to simple imprisonment for 2 days and imposed a fine of Rs. 500, with the alternative of an additional 2 days imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. In determining the sentence, the court considered mitigating factors including the respondent's admission of guilt, her impoverished economic status as the sole breadwinner of her family, and the hardship regular court attendance would cause her livelihood. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts