Government of Gujarat vs VINODBHAI AMRUTLAL KATHAD Advocate - M D GOHIL — 1186/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080017432025
Filing Number
1186/2025
Filing Date
15-11-2025
Registration No
1186/2025
Registration Date
15-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250392
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
VINODBHAI AMRUTLAL KATHAD Advocate - M D GOHIL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 06-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 01-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted accused Vinod Amrutlal Kathad under IPC Section 275 (related to adulterated drugs) and the Bombay Prevention Act Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to a fine of ₹100.50 or two days simple imprisonment in default. The court considered the accused's socioeconomic status, family responsibilities, and plea for reformation while imposing the sentence, deeming rehabilitation appropriate in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted accused Vinod Amrutlal Kathad under IPC Section 275 (related to adulterated drugs) and the Bombay Prevention Act Section 66(1)(b), sentencing him to a fine of ₹100.50 or two days simple imprisonment in default. The court considered the accused's socioeconomic status, family responsibilities, and plea for reformation while imposing the sentence, deeming rehabilitation appropriate in this case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts