Government of Gujarat vs SURESHBHIA HARDASBHAI RAVALIYA — 1182/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017392025

Filing Number

1182/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

1182/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1120303025013

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESHBHIA HARDASBHAI RAVALIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 1182/2025 The court convicted Sureshbhai Hardasbhai Ravaliya under Section 65(1)(bi) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol, sentencing him to imprisonment of 2 days or a fine of Rs. 100, with the latter option being preferred. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's economic hardship, lack of education, family dependence, and difficulty in maintaining regular court attendance before imposing a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 01-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1182/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1182/2025 The court convicted Sureshbhai Hardasbhai Ravaliya under Section 65(1)(bi) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol, sentencing him to imprisonment of 2 days or a fine of Rs. 100, with the latter option being preferred. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's economic hardship, lack of education, family dependence, and difficulty in maintaining regular court attendance before imposing a lenient sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case