Government of Gujarat vs KESHAV PUNJABHAI VADHIYA — 1181/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080017382025

Filing Number

1181/2025

Filing Date

15-Nov-2025

Registration No

1181/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250519

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KESHAV PUNJABHAI VADHIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused, Keshav Punjabhai Vadhiya, under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an educated offense. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹500, with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's economic hardship, illiteracy, and impact on his family before imposing the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 01-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1181/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Keshav Punjabhai Vadhiya, under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an educated offense. The court sentenced him to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of ₹500, with two days simple imprisonment as an alternative if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered mitigating factors including the accused's economic hardship, illiteracy, and impact on his family before imposing the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case