Government of Gujarat vs DILIPBHAI JENTIBHAI TADPADA — 1131/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080016812025

Filing Number

1131/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Registration No

1131/2025

Registration Date

11-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250803

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DILIPBHAI JENTIBHAI TADPADA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1131/2025 The court convicted respondent Dilipbhai Jentibhai Tadpada under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possession of liquor in an educational institution. The defendant pleaded guilty and requested a reduced sentence, citing his status as a poor, illiterate man supporting his family. Accepting these mitigating circumstances and applying sentencing principles established in Gujarat High Court precedent, the court imposed a fine of ₹100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1131/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1131/2025 The court convicted respondent Dilipbhai Jentibhai Tadpada under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possession of liquor in an educational institution. The defendant pleaded guilty and requested a reduced sentence, citing his status as a poor, illiterate man supporting his family. Accepting these mitigating circumstances and applying sentencing principles established in Gujarat High Court precedent, the court imposed a fine of ₹100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) instead of the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case