Government of Gujarat vs MAHESHBHAI RAMDEBHAI SONDARVA — 1114/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080016622025

Filing Number

1114/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

1114/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030240481

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHESHBHAI RAMDEBHAI SONDARVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Maheshbhai Ramdebhai Sondarva under Section 65(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol. Considering the respondent's plea of guilt, his socioeconomic circumstances as a poor family member and sole earner, and the hardship imprisonment would cause his family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1114/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Maheshbhai Ramdebhai Sondarva under Section 65(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for unlawful possession of alcohol. Considering the respondent's plea of guilt, his socioeconomic circumstances as a poor family member and sole earner, and the hardship imprisonment would cause his family, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 100 fine (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default) rather than the maximum prescribed penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case