Government of Gujarat vs BHIMJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI MAKWANA Advocate - D K PARMAR — 1111/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080016592025
Filing Number
1111/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
1111/2025
Registration Date
10-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030240219
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
BHIMJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI MAKWANA Advocate - D K PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 05-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 29-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused, Bhimjibhai Bhikhabhai Makwana, under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 64(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 with imprisonment for 2 days in default. The court considered the accused's plea regarding his impoverished circumstances and reformation prospects while imposing the sentence, and ordered confiscation of seized valuables and vehicles, with property to be returned if no forfeiture order existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused, Bhimjibhai Bhikhabhai Makwana, under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 64(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, sentencing him to a fine of ₹1,005 with imprisonment for 2 days in default. The court considered the accused's plea regarding his impoverished circumstances and reformation prospects while imposing the sentence, and ordered confiscation of seized valuables and vehicles, with property to be returned if no forfeiture order existed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts