Government of Gujarat vs LALITKUMAR BALIRAM MANDAL Advocate - J M VANPARIYA — 1101/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080016492025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1101/2025

Filing Date

10-11-2025

Registration No

1101/2025

Registration Date

10-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250718

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

LALITKUMAR BALIRAM MANDAL Advocate - J M VANPARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

05-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

29-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The court convicted the accused, Lalitkumar Baliram Mandal, under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a vehicle while intoxicated and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 5,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid). The court considered the accused's plea of hardship regarding his role as the sole breadwinner of his family, but upheld the conviction while exercising judicial discretion to impose a reasonable punishment under applicable sentencing guidelines established by Gujarat High Court precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted the accused, Lalitkumar Baliram Mandal, under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicles Act for driving a vehicle while intoxicated and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 5,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid). The court considered the accused's plea of hardship regarding his role as the sole breadwinner of his family, but upheld the conviction while exercising judicial discretion to impose a reasonable punishment under applicable sentencing guidelines established by Gujarat High Court precedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case