Government of Gujarat vs PRAMJIBHAI DAYABHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - R L SOLANKI — 1096/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080016442025
Filing Number
1096/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
1096/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250639
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAMJIBHAI DAYABHAI CHUDASAMA Advocate - R L SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted accused Pramjibhai Dayabhai Chudasama under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, imposing a fine of Rs. 10,045, with two days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court ordered confiscation of contraband materials, vehicles, and penalties, while finding the accused guilty based on credible evidence and rejecting his defense plea of being from a poor background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
05-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1096/2025
The court convicted accused Pramjibhai Dayabhai Chudasama under Section 275 of the IPC and Section 66(1)(b) of the Bombay Prohibition Act, imposing a fine of Rs. 10,045, with two days simple imprisonment as default punishment. The court ordered confiscation of contraband materials, vehicles, and penalties, while finding the accused guilty based on credible evidence and rejecting his defense plea of being from a poor background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts