Government of Gujarat vs PRABHABEN GOVINDBHAI CHAVDA — 1095/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080016432025

Filing Number

1095/2025

Filing Date

10-Nov-2025

Registration No

1095/2025

Registration Date

10-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250723

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRABHABEN GOVINDBHAI CHAVDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Prabhaben Govindbhai Chavda under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol, but exercised leniency in sentencing. Considering her circumstances—poverty, being the sole earner for her family, and potential hardship in attending court proceedings—the court sentenced her to imprisonment with a fine of ₹500 (or two days' simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), rather than the maximum sentence possible. The court balanced the need for justice with humanitarian considerations regarding her social and economic status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copies To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Copies To Accused

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 29-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1095/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Prabhaben Govindbhai Chavda under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol, but exercised leniency in sentencing. Considering her circumstances—poverty, being the sole earner for her family, and potential hardship in attending court proceedings—the court sentenced her to imprisonment with a fine of ₹500 (or two days' simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), rather than the maximum sentence possible. The court balanced the need for justice with humanitarian considerations regarding her social and economic status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case