Government of Gujarat vs PRABHABEN GOVINDBHAI CHAVDA — 1095/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080016432025
Filing Number
1095/2025
Filing Date
10-11-2025
Registration No
1095/2025
Registration Date
10-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250723
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
PRABHABEN GOVINDBHAI CHAVDA
Hearing History
Judge: 2-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
COPIES TO ACCUSED
COPIES TO ACCUSED
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | COPIES TO ACCUSED |
| 05-02-2026 | COPIES TO ACCUSED |
| 29-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted Prabhaben Govindbhai Chavda under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol, but exercised leniency in sentencing. Considering her circumstances—poverty, being the sole earner for her family, and potential hardship in attending court proceedings—the court sentenced her to imprisonment with a fine of ₹500 (or two days' simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), rather than the maximum sentence possible. The court balanced the need for justice with humanitarian considerations regarding her social and economic status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted Prabhaben Govindbhai Chavda under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for possessing alcohol, but exercised leniency in sentencing. Considering her circumstances—poverty, being the sole earner for her family, and potential hardship in attending court proceedings—the court sentenced her to imprisonment with a fine of ₹500 (or two days' simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), rather than the maximum sentence possible. The court balanced the need for justice with humanitarian considerations regarding her social and economic status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts