Government of Gujarat vs ISRADBHAI SULAMANBHAI PADAYA Advocate - A C RANINGA — 1091/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080016392025
Filing Number
1091/2025
Filing Date
07-11-2025
Registration No
1091/2025
Registration Date
07-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250256
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
ISRADBHAI SULAMANBHAI PADAYA Advocate - A C RANINGA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 02-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
| 31-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (with simple imprisonment for 2 days if fine is unpaid), and ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicle. The court granted the accused the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act after considering his poor financial circumstances and family responsibilities, with a condition that he abstain from similar offenses in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (with simple imprisonment for 2 days if fine is unpaid), and ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicle. The court granted the accused the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act after considering his poor financial circumstances and family responsibilities, with a condition that he abstain from similar offenses in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts