Government of Gujarat vs ISRADBHAI SULAMANBHAI PADAYA Advocate - A C RANINGA — 1091/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080016392025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1091/2025

Filing Date

07-11-2025

Registration No

1091/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250256

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

ISRADBHAI SULAMANBHAI PADAYA Advocate - A C RANINGA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

02-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

31-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (with simple imprisonment for 2 days if fine is unpaid), and ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicle. The court granted the accused the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act after considering his poor financial circumstances and family responsibilities, with a condition that he abstain from similar offenses in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (with simple imprisonment for 2 days if fine is unpaid), and ordering forfeiture of seized valuables and vehicle. The court granted the accused the benefit of probation under the Probation of Offenders Act after considering his poor financial circumstances and family responsibilities, with a condition that he abstain from similar offenses in future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case