Government of Gujarat vs AAMDKHAN CHOTUKHAN BELIM Advocate - R L SOLANKI — 1068/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080016152025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1068/2025

Filing Date

07-11-2025

Registration No

1068/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250505

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AAMDKHAN CHOTUKHAN BELIM Advocate - R L SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.

14-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

02-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

31-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. Considering the accused's pleas of poverty, being the sole breadwinner, and lack of prior criminal record, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default) rather than imposing the maximum penalty, exercising judicial discretion to balance punishment with the accused's socioeconomic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. Considering the accused's pleas of poverty, being the sole breadwinner, and lack of prior criminal record, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default) rather than imposing the maximum penalty, exercising judicial discretion to balance punishment with the accused's socioeconomic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case