Government of Gujarat vs AAMDKHAN CHOTUKHAN BELIM Advocate - R L SOLANKI — 1068/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080016152025
Filing Number
1068/2025
Filing Date
07-Nov-2025
Registration No
1068/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030250505
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.AAMDKHAN CHOTUKHAN BELIM Advocate - R L SOLANKI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. Considering the accused's pleas of poverty, being the sole breadwinner, and lack of prior criminal record, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default) rather than imposing the maximum penalty, exercising judicial discretion to balance punishment with the accused's socioeconomic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
11-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
02-Feb-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
31-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1068/2025
The court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Probation of Offenders Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle while intoxicated. Considering the accused's pleas of poverty, being the sole breadwinner, and lack of prior criminal record, the court sentenced him to a fine of ₹5,000 (or 10 days imprisonment in default) rather than imposing the maximum penalty, exercising judicial discretion to balance punishment with the accused's socioeconomic circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts