Government of Gujarat vs RUPESHBHAI HARSHUKHBHAI VAGHELA — 1049/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJJN080015922025

Filing Number

1049/2025

Filing Date

06-Nov-2025

Registration No

1049/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KESHOD

Judge

2-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 21-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11203030250492

Police Station

KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65,A,A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUPESHBHAI HARSHUKHBHAI VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an offense related to illicit liquor and sentenced him to imprisonment until the court rises, plus a fine of Rs. 500 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's poor economic condition, family circumstances, and need for regular employment. The court exercised its discretion to impose a lenient sentence based on established precedents from Gujarat High Court jurisprudence regarding mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 31-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1049/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an offense related to illicit liquor and sentenced him to imprisonment until the court rises, plus a fine of Rs. 500 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's poor economic condition, family circumstances, and need for regular employment. The court exercised its discretion to impose a lenient sentence based on established precedents from Gujarat High Court jurisprudence regarding mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case