Government of Gujarat vs UGAMSI DHANO BALUBHAI TOTIYA — 745/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65 A A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJJN080011762025
Filing Number
745/2025
Filing Date
12-Aug-2025
Registration No
745/2025
Registration Date
12-Aug-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, KESHOD
Judge
1-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11203030230534
Police Station
KESHOD POLICE STATION - JUNAGADH DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.UGAMSI DHANO BALUBHAI TOTIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case 745/2025 Summary The court convicted Ugamsi Dhano Balubhai Totiya under Section 65 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (with simple imprisonment for 2 days as default). The court found the accused guilty of prohibition-related offense and ordered confiscation of valuables, vehicles, and penalty amounts, while considering the accused's plea for reformation as he belongs to an economically disadvantaged background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
07-Mar-2026
Summons - Notice
Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Jan-2026
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Dec-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Nov-2025
Summons - Notice
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 745/2025
Case 745/2025 Summary The court convicted Ugamsi Dhano Balubhai Totiya under Section 65 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Section 275 of the IPC, sentencing him to a fine of ₹500 (with simple imprisonment for 2 days as default). The court found the accused guilty of prohibition-related offense and ordered confiscation of valuables, vehicles, and penalty amounts, while considering the accused's plea for reformation as he belongs to an economically disadvantaged background. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts